Raghu Para, Cross-Platform AI Engineer & Founding Partner — Pivotal AI Projects, RAG & Agentic AI, Scalable Architecture, LLM Customization, AI Leadership, and the Future of Intelligent Systems – AI Time Journal

In this interview, we speak with Raghu Para, Cross-Platform AI Engineer and Founding Partner at a company focused on building scalable, intelligent systems that operate seamlessly across platforms and industries. Raghu shares perspectives on topics ranging from Retrieval-Augmented Generation and agentic AI to the future of AI-driven automation in manufacturing and logistics. He also addresses the evolving role of engineers in an AI-first era and the practical challenges of customizing large language models for production. Read on for insights into how AI systems are being built for both scale and adaptability.

Explore more interviews here: Kevin Frechette, Co-Founder & CEO at Fairmarkit — Journey from IBM and Dell, Defining Agentic AI, AI Adoption Challenges, Ensuring Compliance, High-Stakes Applications, Scaling Innovation, Procurement Evolution, Success Metrics, Sonoco Case Study, Entrepreneur Advice

You’ve had a dynamic journey shaping AI solutions across continents. Can you walk us through a pivotal project that defined your evolution as a cross-platform AI engineer?

One defining project involved leading the end-to-end design of an AI-driven data quality engine that operated across hybrid data platforms from SQL Server to GCP-native BigQuery. The challenge wasn’t just technical; it was systemic. We had to bridge disparate metadata ecosystems, develop real-time rule recommendation models, and ensure that everything scaled horizontally. It taught me that AI engineering isn’t just about algorithms but also about making intelligent systems play well in complex, production-grade environments.

You’re a strong advocate of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and agentic function calling. How do you see these evolving into standard building blocks of enterprise AI?

RAG and agentic orchestration aren’t just architectural features. They’re paradigms for adaptive intelligence and defining ongoing and newer capabilities. RAG enables enterprises to bring proprietary context into generative reasoning, making AI outputs business-relevant. Agentic function, on the other hand, is very powerful and bridges intent and execution, and seamlessly operationalizes cognition. Shortly, I see enterprise AI frameworks having built-in support for agent-led task routing, memory-based reasoning, and autonomous workflow chaining. We’re moving from query-based intelligence to collaborative AI agents as co-workers.

AI architecture today demands both depth and agility. What principles guide you when architecting scalable, high-performance AI pipelines for global impact?

I follow four core principles: stateless cores, intelligent edges, composable flows, and elastic observability*.* Stateless cores allow services to scale without bottlenecks. Intelligent edges bring computation closer to data, which is especially useful in latency-critical environments. Composability ensures that models, rules, and data profiles can be swapped without full rewrites. And elastic observability with structured logs, metrics, and tracing ensures every AI decision is accountable. And again, even under scale.

As someone who’s delivered AI systems valued at over $800 million in annual revenue, what metrics do you use to evaluate long-term business value versus short-term success?

While short-term metrics often center around latency, throughput, or model accuracy, long-term value is evaluated across four axes: time-to-adaptation (how fast can the model evolve?), systemic resilience (how gracefully does the system degrade?), explainability depth (Can business users trust the outcome?), and net data leverage (How much does the AI improve from usage over time?). Real ROI lies in compounding intelligence, not just early precision.

How do you envision Agentic AI transforming industries like automotive, manufacturing, and logistics in the next five years?

In the automotive industry, agentic AI will power intelligent diagnostics, edge-driven anomaly detection, and predictive maintenance. In manufacturing, we’ll see decentralized agent networks orchestrating everything from supply chain decisions to defect detection in real time. Logistics will transform via autonomous agents optimizing routes, inventory, and real-time demand forecasts, and the agents even collaborate across organizations in secure and federated environments. Agentic AI makes orchestration dynamic, contextual, and autonomous.

You sit at the intersection of engineering and leadership. What mindset shifts are necessary for aspiring engineers looking to lead in the AI-first era?

I think engineers must shift from being “builders” to “strategic integrators.” It’s not enough to write great code; you must understand product timelines, the cost of inference, model lifecycle governance, and the ethics of automation. Leadership in AI requires systems and designs thinking, stakeholder empathy, and a comfort with a tinge of ambiguity because the frontier is still being mapped.

What are some unique challenges you’ve faced customizing LLMs for production use, and how have you overcome them?

Latency and hallucination are the two recurring hurdles. In one case, we had to design a hybrid system where deterministic rules complemented generative LLM outputs. We also implemented metadata-aware prompt tuning and used semantic fallback layers with vector indexing. The key was balancing creativity and correctness and ensuring that the LLM was bounded by business context without limiting its reasoning power.

With the pace of automation accelerating, what advice would you give to professionals worried about job displacement versus opportunity creation?

Look for roles that orchestrate human-machine symbiosis. The best roles in the future won’t be about competing with AI. They’ll be about curating, auditing, steering, leveraging, and properly amplifying it. The most future-proof skillsets combine domain knowledge with the ability to question, validate, and fine-tune AI behavior. You don’t need to become a prompt engineer. You need to become an AI collaborator.

Lastly, if AI were a cuisine, what dish would best represent your approach to building intelligent systems and why?

I’d say a perfectly balanced bento box with a system, which is diverse, modular, and adaptive to regional preferences, but designed with a unifying philosophy. Just like each dish in the box has a role, like spice, base, or refreshment, every component in an AI system must complement the whole. It’s not about maximizing individual models but designing orchestration that satisfies multiple appetites: interpretability, impact, and again, as usual, scale.