
(© koya979 – stock.adobe.com)
In a nutshell
- Men with excellent sperm quality live approximately 2.7 years longer than those with poor semen quality, indicating reproductive health may serve as a window into overall health and longevity.
- The relationship between semen quality and mortality follows a clear dose-response pattern—the better the semen quality, the lower the mortality risk—even for men with sperm counts well above fertility thresholds.
- Fertility evaluations could potentially serve as an early health screening tool, helping identify men who might benefit from preventive interventions long before other health issues become apparent.
COPENHAGEN — Men with high-quality sperm tend to live nearly three years longer than those with poor semen quality, according to landmark research that followed more than 78,000 men for up to five decades. This discovery suggests that reproductive health may serve as a window into a man’s overall health and longevity.
Published in Human Reproduction, this Danish study is the largest and longest of its kind. The research demonstrates a clear pattern: as semen quality improves, the risk of premature death decreases, regardless of education level or pre-existing health conditions.
“Men with a total motile sperm count of >120 million could expect to live 80.3 years, compared to 77.6 years among men with a total motile count of >0–5 million,” the researchers report. This 2.7-year difference persisted even after accounting for various factors.
“We calculated the men’s life expectancy according to their semen quality and found that men with the best quality could expect to live two to three years longer, on average, than men with the lowest semen quality,” explains Dr. Lærke Priskorn, senior researcher at Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet and lead author, in a statement. “The lower the semen quality, the lower the life expectancy. This association was not explained by any diseases in the ten years before semen quality assessment or the men’s educational level.”
Beyond Previous Research
Earlier studies had hinted at connections between male fertility and health outcomes, but most only looked at basic markers like whether a man had fathered children or received an infertility diagnosis. This research advances our understanding by directly measuring multiple aspects of semen quality and following participants for decades—some for nearly half a century.
The research team analyzed data from 78,284 men who had their semen assessed between 1965 and 2015 at a public laboratory in Copenhagen. These men had been referred for semen analysis due to self-reported couple infertility, resulting in a study population with a wide range of semen quality.
Researchers measured semen volume, sperm concentration, the proportion of motile sperm, and the percentage of normally shaped sperm. From these measurements, they calculated total sperm count and total motile sperm count, providing a comprehensive picture of both quantity and quality.
A Clear Pattern Emerges
By linking semen data to Denmark’s national health registers, researchers tracked mortality outcomes for a median of 23 years, with some men followed for as long as 45 years. During this time, 8,600 deaths occurred among the study participants.
The analysis revealed a consistent pattern: men with better semen parameters had lower mortality rates across the board. Importantly, this wasn’t limited to comparing fertile versus infertile men—the relationship persisted across the entire spectrum of semen quality, extending well into ranges considered normal.
While medical guidelines consider sperm concentrations of 16 million per milliliter adequate for fertility, the mortality benefit continued to improve at levels far above this threshold. This suggests that what fertility specialists deem “sufficient” for reproduction may not necessarily reflect optimal health.
Oxidative Stress & Sperm Quality
What could explain the relationship between reproductive health and longevity? The findings prompt questions about underlying biological mechanisms that might influence both sperm quality and overall health.
In an accompanying editorial in Human Reproduction, Distinguished Emeritus Professor John Aitken from the University of Newcastle, Australia, calls the study a “landmark” publication and proposes oxidative stress as a potential common denominator.
Oxidative stress occurs when there’s an imbalance between damaging free radicals and protective antioxidants in the body. This imbalance can harm cells throughout the body, including sperm cells, and plays a known role in aging.
“Any factor (genetic, immunological, metabolic, environmental or lifestyle) that enhances overall levels of oxidative stress, could reasonably be expected to drive changes in the semen profile and subsequent patterns of mortality,” writes Professor Aitken. He also suggests this mechanism might help explain links between pregnancy complications and female mortality, noting that “circulating antioxidant levels are generally higher in women than men, just as their telomeres are usually longer.”
Implications for Men’s Health
“We need to better understand the association between semen quality and men’s general health,” says Dr. Niels Jørgensen, chief andrologist at Copenhagen University Hospital and study co-author. “However, this study suggests that we can identify subgroups of men with impaired semen quality who appear healthy at the time of semen assessment but who may be at increased risk of developing certain diseases later in life.”
Jørgensen emphasizes, “Thus, fertility evaluations, which are typically conducted when men are relatively young, could provide an opportunity for detecting and mitigating the risks of other health problems in the longer term. In the current study, we did not analyze whether poor semen quality was associated with earlier deaths from particular causes, such as cancer or heart disease, and this is something we will be studying in the future. Using other groups of men, we will also try to identify relevant biomarkers that can help recognize subgroups of men at increased risk. This is key to initiating relevant prevention strategies.”
For men generally, these findings highlight reproductive health as an important component of overall wellness—not just for those trying to conceive. While the research does not establish causality (improving semen quality wouldn’t necessarily extend lifespan), it indicates that many factors affecting general health also impact reproductive function.
Study Nuances and Future Directions
An interesting pattern emerged regarding men with no sperm at all (azoospermia). While this group showed elevated mortality compared to men with excellent semen quality, their risk was slightly lower than men with very low sperm counts. This likely reflects the mixed nature of azoospermia—some cases result from blockages with otherwise normal sperm production, while others indicate more fundamental reproductive problems.
The study had notable strengths and limitations. Its unprecedented size and decades-long follow-up provide robust data. However, lifestyle factors like smoking, weight, and exercise weren’t directly measured, though education level served as a partial proxy. Additionally, the focus on Danish men may limit global applicability, and health assessments were limited to hospital diagnoses, potentially missing conditions managed by primary care physicians.
Future research will explore whether poor semen quality correlates with specific causes of death and will aim to identify biomarkers that could help recognize men at the highest risk for health problems.
Paper Summary
Methodology
The study used the Danish Semen Quality Database, containing records from 78,284 men who provided semen samples at Copenhagen’s public laboratory between 1965 and 2015. All participants were between 18 and 65 years old and had sought testing due to couple infertility issues, resulting in a diverse range of semen quality.
Men maintained a 3-4 day abstinence period before providing samples, which were analyzed under standardized conditions. Tests measured semen volume, sperm concentration, movement ability (motility), and shape (morphology). Researchers calculated total sperm count by multiplying volume by concentration, and determined total motile sperm count by factoring in the percentage of swimming sperm.
Using Denmark’s comprehensive national registry system, researchers tracked participants’ health outcomes through December 2023. For 59,657 men who provided samples from 1987 onward, additional data on education level and medical diagnoses in the ten years before testing was available.
Statistical methods included calculating life expectancy based on semen quality and analyzing mortality risks while adjusting for various factors.
Results
The data showed that men with total motile sperm counts exceeding 120 million had a projected lifespan of 80.3 years, compared to 77.6 years for those with very low counts (0-5 million) – a significant 2.7-year difference.
After adjusting for education and pre-existing conditions, men with azoospermia (no sperm) had 39% higher mortality risk compared to those with excellent semen quality. Men with very low motile sperm counts (0-5 million) faced even higher risks at 61% increased mortality. The risk decreased progressively with improving semen quality.
The relationship between semen quality and mortality appeared particularly strong among men with existing health issues, highlighting semen quality as a potential early warning system in vulnerable populations.
These patterns remained consistent when excluding deaths within five years of semen assessment, suggesting the relationship reflects long-term health connections rather than short-term illness effects.
Limitations
Despite its impressive scale and follow-up duration, this study has several notable constraints. The researchers lacked information on key lifestyle factors like smoking, diet, and physical activity that influence both sperm quality and mortality. While education level served as a proxy for health behaviors, this provides only partial control. Additionally, health assessments were limited to hospital diagnoses, missing conditions managed in primary care settings.
The study population consisted entirely of Danish men seeking fertility evaluation, potentially limiting global applicability. Another significant limitation involves men with azoospermia (no sperm), as the research couldn’t distinguish between those with obstructive causes (where sperm production may be normal but blocked) versus non-obstructive causes reflecting fundamental reproductive dysfunction—a distinction with potentially different health implications.
Discussion and Takeaways
This landmark study transforms our understanding of male reproductive health, revealing semen quality as a potential barometer for overall health and longevity. The clear dose-response relationship—where mortality risk decreased progressively with improving semen quality—persisted even among men with sperm counts above fertility thresholds, suggesting that what specialists consider “adequate” for conception may not represent optimal health. For healthcare providers, these findings suggest expanding semen analysis beyond fertility assessment to identify men who might benefit from earlier health interventions.
From a biological perspective, the relationship between reproductive function and longevity aligns with evolutionary principles, with Professor Aitken’s oxidative stress hypothesis offering a compelling mechanistic explanation. For men generally, this research highlights reproductive health as an integral component of overall wellness, not just relevant during family planning. While improving semen quality wouldn’t necessarily extend lifespan, many factors supporting general health also benefit reproductive function, creating opportunities for interventions with multiple benefits.
Funding and Disclosures
The study received funding from Johan and Hanne Weimann, F. Seedorff’s grant (F-24230-01), and the Research Fund of the Capital Region of Denmark (R-153-A6176). The authors declared no competing interests, and funders had no role in study design, analysis, or publication decisions.
Publication Details
“Semen quality and lifespan: a study of 78,284 men followed for up to 50 years” was published in Human Reproduction in 2025. The research was led by Dr. Lærke Priskorn and Dr. Niels Jørgensen from the Department of Growth and Reproduction at Copenhagen University Hospital—Rigshospitalet, with contributors from multiple Danish institutions. The paper is available at https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf023.
#Men #strong #sperm #live #longer